<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="https://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &quot;Come see our latest creation&quot; Apple iTablet Event Live Meta-Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://iphoneroot.com/come-see-our-latest-creation-live-meta-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://iphoneroot.com/come-see-our-latest-creation-live-meta-blog/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 18:06:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rudvalis</title>
		<link>https://iphoneroot.com/come-see-our-latest-creation-live-meta-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-786</link>
		<dc:creator>rudvalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphoneroot.com/?p=5894#comment-786</guid>
		<description>Hi: In viewing the presentation I saw what might be a
dealbreaker for me with time stamp between 10:14 and 
10:15:  10:15AM No flash here… the missing plugin icon is on screen.  If they don&#039;t have runtime Java this 
device will not be able to run a variety of programs
that I currently run on both my PCs and Macs.  I feel
that my iPod Touch is extremely hobbled by not having
runtime Java and it seems that Apple has hobbled the
new iPad in the same way.  The other deficiency I see
immediately is no iSight???  Even the iPhone and the
iPod Nano have this so why is it too much to ask that
it be included in the iPad.  My guess is that due to
user demand they will have to put an iSight into the
NEXT generation of the iPad.  As for runtime Java,
even Steve could not get to a website he tried to
surf to because of no runtime Java.  This seems to
be a corporate decision but it seems as shortsighted
as the decision not to enable the iPod Touch to do
runtime Java or as some people refer to it Java 
Flash.    Arunas Rudvalis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi: In viewing the presentation I saw what might be a<br />
dealbreaker for me with time stamp between 10:14 and<br />
10:15:  10:15AM No flash here… the missing plugin icon is on screen.  If they don't have runtime Java this<br />
device will not be able to run a variety of programs<br />
that I currently run on both my PCs and Macs.  I feel<br />
that my iPod Touch is extremely hobbled by not having<br />
runtime Java and it seems that Apple has hobbled the<br />
new iPad in the same way.  The other deficiency I see<br />
immediately is no iSight???  Even the iPhone and the<br />
iPod Nano have this so why is it too much to ask that<br />
it be included in the iPad.  My guess is that due to<br />
user demand they will have to put an iSight into the<br />
NEXT generation of the iPad.  As for runtime Java,<br />
even Steve could not get to a website he tried to<br />
surf to because of no runtime Java.  This seems to<br />
be a corporate decision but it seems as shortsighted<br />
as the decision not to enable the iPod Touch to do<br />
runtime Java or as some people refer to it Java<br />
Flash.    Arunas Rudvalis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
